States and some organisations have expressed their views about the utility, purpose, scope and process of the legal review of weapons in various different contexts. Some of these views have been recorded domestic documents, such as military manuals on the law of armed conflict. Increasingly, however, States and organisations have articulated their positions in a range of international fora, either through written submissions or oral interventions.
This database compiles and organises publicly expressed views in relation to legal reviews, without prejudice to their relative significance or effect (for example, in terms of the development of customary international law). The database aims to comprehensively reflect the views of states but only covers the positions of a small number of selected organisations.
This database currently contains 379 positions and is continuously updated. Any corrections, or suggestions to add material, are welcome.
1 position Australia (remove filter) IC RCRC (remove filter) Clear all
International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent
2024
Voluntary Report on the Implementation of IHL in Australia
Does the government conduct legal reviews under Article 36 of Additional Protocol I to determine whether new weapons, means or methods of warfare may be employed in accordance with Australia’s international legal obligations? Article 36 of Additional Protocol I requires that: In the study, development, …