Positions of States and Organisations

States and some organisations have expressed their views about the utility, purpose, scope and process of the legal review of weapons in various different contexts. Some of these views have been recorded domestic documents, such as military manuals on the law of armed conflict. Increasingly, however, States and organisations have articulated their positions in a range of international fora, either through written submissions or oral interventions.

This database compiles and organises publicly expressed views in relation to legal reviews, without prejudice to their relative significance or effect (for example, in terms of the development of customary international law). The database aims to comprehensively reflect the views of states but only covers the positions of a small number of selected organisations.

This database currently contains 379 positions and is continuously updated. Any corrections, or suggestions to add material, are welcome.

2005

  1. IHL and ERW: Response from Australia

    29 July 2005State or organisation: AustraliaForum: WG ERW

    14. Weapon review compliance is also an issue taken seriously by the Australian Defence Force. An Instruction dealing with the legal review of new weapons came into force on 02 June 2005. This requires the legal review of all proposed new weapons to determine whether …