States and some organisations have expressed their views about the utility, purpose, scope and process of the legal review of weapons in various different contexts. Some of these views have been recorded domestic documents, such as military manuals on the law of armed conflict. Increasingly, however, States and organisations have articulated their positions in a range of international fora, either through written submissions or oral interventions.
This database compiles and organises publicly expressed views in relation to legal reviews, without prejudice to their relative significance or effect (for example, in terms of the development of customary international law). The database aims to comprehensively reflect the views of states but only covers the positions of a small number of selected organisations.
This database currently contains 379 positions and is continuously updated. Any corrections, or suggestions to add material, are welcome.
2 positions Ukraine (remove filter) GGE LAWS 2026 (remove filter) Clear all
2026 Group of Governmental Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems
2026
Statement by Ukraine
As for paragraph 39, We recognize that this paragraph largely reflects the duty found in Article 36 of Additional Protocol I. Some States, acting in their sovereign right, chose not to join the Protocol. However, we also know that some States not parties to the …
Statement by Ukraine
Human rights law is a frequently cited example of other law that applies in armed conflict, but we must also be mindful of international maritime law, international air and space law, the law of state responsibility, and other areas of law. To support the mention …