Positions of States and Organisations

States and some organisations have expressed their views about the utility, purpose, scope and process of the legal review of weapons in various different contexts. Some of these views have been recorded domestic documents, such as military manuals on the law of armed conflict. Increasingly, however, States and organisations have articulated their positions in a range of international fora, either through written submissions or oral interventions.

This database compiles and organises publicly expressed views in relation to legal reviews, without prejudice to their relative significance or effect (for example, in terms of the development of customary international law). The database aims to comprehensively reflect the views of states but only covers the positions of a small number of selected organisations.

This database currently contains 379 positions and is continuously updated. Any corrections, or suggestions to add material, are welcome.

2024

  1. Submission by the Republic of Moldova to the Secretary-General

    30 May 2024State or organisation: MoldovaForum: UNGA Res 78/241

    […] existing international humanitarian law (Article 36 "New Weapons" of the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, signed on 12 August 1949) provides that "in the research, development, acquisition or adoption of new means or methods of warfare, a High Contracting Party shall be …